Sparkplug 41

I’ll give you just one guess what this week’s Sparkplug is about…

Actually, as I was putting this one together, I couldn’t decide which headline to go with… so here are all of them:

When is a rule not a rule?
The AMA shoots itself in the foot.
The death of credibility.
What is a sanction worth in supercross racing?
Who’s running this show anyway?

Take a gander at this AMA press release (if you haven’t seen it already), courtesy Racer X Online. The long and short of it is that the AMA and FIM have decided to change Team Suzuki’s and Rick Carmichael’s 25 point penalty, given for using illegal fuel at the San Diego round, to a $20,000 cash penalty. The champ’s championship points were restored as of today.

So what’s the problem? The problem is that a cash penalty for this infraction is not what’s stated in the rules. “Again,” you ask, “What’s the problem?… the guys who made the rules are changing them.” Cool the eff out, some suggest…

I’m just asking, how is it right to change the rulebook midway through a season? And how bad does it look to rescind a penalty given to the defending champion? And what were the grounds again… because the fuel, although out of spec, doesn’t really enhance performance?

The AMA really opened Pandora’s box with this one.

Number one, there is no question about what’s in the rule book… it denotes the lead levels and the penalty for infraction. It’s been there for the past three years. Everyone knew about it.

Number two, there is also no question that it’s a relatively bogus rule. Relative, in that there are serious questions about the rule’s purpose and intent. Apparently, the lead level as stated in the rule is so low that unleaded pump gas is considered illegal. Add to that the opinion by many that this small level of lead is in no way beneficial to a rider, and that equals a rule that is questionable at best.

But no one can question the fact that the rule exists. The AMA was well within its rights to enforce it, just as it had enforced the rule against Kawasaki in 2005 and Yamaha in 2004. So the question changed to the penalty… was it too strict?

According to Team Suzuki manager Roger DeCoster, hell yeah. Check out Roger’s latest interview (again, courtesy Racer X Online). This issue was so intense, he actually had to tell his team to “Stay off the internet” this week. Roger even admits that he wished he had stood up when the same penalty happened to Yamaha two years ago: “I feel bad that I did not go out of my way and ask to help them. I didn’t go over and ask if I could help,” DeCoster also added, “…but they also did not come to me and say, “Can we band together?”

So… what does it all mean, Gene? To me, it just reinforces the fact that the American Motorcyclist Association really needs to get out of the business of professional motorcycle sport. AMA referee Steve Whitelock is a great guy, no doubt, but his organization has consistently demonstrated an inability to conduct business in a serious, well-thought-out manner. As I mentioned in an earlier entry, now that American Honda has bailed from the AMA’s Board of Directors, it is just a matter of time before the other manufacturers follow… and this last debacle, for that is truly what this was, could be just the spark to ignite a mass exodus. I am really interested in hearing Yamaha and Kawasaki’s response to this latest development.